Gatling vs JMeter: the developer-centric upgrade without compromise

JMeter was built for a different era when just a “testing tool” was needed. Gatling is built for the way engineering teams ship today - code-native, integration-ready, AI-powered and built for scale.

Stop maintaining legacy GUI-based tests. Start trusting performance results and make them visible to engineering leaders. The last migration you'll thank yourself for.

A Legacy Test Tool
vs a
Continuous Performance Intelligence Platform

Configuration-based tools made sense before CI/CD. Code-native load testing is how modern engineering teams ship with confidence.

JMeter

A testing tool from another era. Your QA's tool, not your team's tool.

Gatling

Performance testing reimagined for how teams build today.

Tests stored as XML, no IDE support

Resource-intensive
at scale

Modern protocols depend on third-party plugins

CI/CD integration requires manual setup

Code-first: Java, JavaScript, TypeScript, Scala, Kotlin

Async engine: millions of Virtual Users on a single machine

Every modern protocol
built in

Native CI/CD integration: GitHub Actions, GitLab, Jenkins, and more

Reduce risk with Gatling.
Welcome to
Continuous Performance Intelligence.

Beyond being a robust, modern alternative to JMeter, Gatling offers a complete performance engineering stack for developers, QA, and SRE teams.

Your JMeter tests, already in Gatling.

Gatling's Migration Assistant converts your existing JMeter test plans into Gatling scenarios automatically. Keep your existing coverage, remove the migration friction, and hit the ground running with a modern testing stack.

Powered by an AI skill available for your AI Coding Assistant: Claud, Cursor, or any compatible IDE.

Watch the demo
Watch the demo

Gatling vs JMeter
Feature-by-feature comparison

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Gatling

JMeter

Edge

Why engineering teams
switch to Gatling

Three years ago, releasing our core banking system meant days of stress. Today, deployments are stable and invisible to our users.

Alexandre Baert
Pre-production Platform Manager, Nickel

We first had a dedicated load testing unit working with another load testing tool, but we moved to Gatling Enterprise for two reasons: lower price and project autonomy.

Pierre-Yves Gautier
Product Manager Observability, SNCF Connect & Tech

We had to create and maintain our own infrastructure to run JMeter and ghz. With Enterprise, that's handled for us, which saves a lot of engineering time.

Bian Jiang
Principal Engineer, Developer Experience, Attentive

We were using homegrown or open-source solutions that were hard to maintain. That pushed performance testing to the back burner; it only ran when absolutely necessary.

Kundan Singh
Director of Product and Engineering, LoginRadius

With autoscaled generators we stopped maintaining boxes. We likely saved FTEs — now we pay a subscription instead of paying with people's time.

Mateusz Piasta
Site Reliability Engineer, InPost

Run comparison is a big one. We used to export CSVs and graphs by hand. Now we compare runs directly and get useful insights in real time.

Alexandre Baert
Pre-production Platform Manager, Nickel

Before Gatling, going live felt like crossing our fingers and hoping it held. Now we can simulate, measure, and move forward with clarity.

Nordine El Mojahid
Head of Digital IT, Tape à l'œil

Ready to
make the switch?

See how your existing JMeter tests map to Gatling — and what you gain on the other side.

Your all-in-one load testing platform

Design complex tests, manage global infrastructure, and turn results into action on one powerful platform.

Need technical references and tutorials?

Minimal features, for local use only